That is how things are supposed to work in a community open-source project. It's ok to dissent, but it needs to be done gracefully and respectfully and at some point a person has to concede to the larger group for the sake of everyone going forward and continuing to work together. Working together often implies accepting the community decisions, even if you don't always agree. Open-source is about working together as a community. that is not what open-source is all about. We see in politics what happens when everyone simply tries to tear each other down and ruin what they other guys are trying to build. I think a few people have watched too much politics on TV and learned the tricks a little too well and now attempt to apply them here. Sometimes people think they are saving the project from itself when in fact they are doing much greater harm by spreading a blanket of negativity over the entire project, promoting mistrust, trying to wedge and split and create issues and take sides. This is a sad part of open-source projects that openly let anyone participate and contribute. There is at least one individual who is actively trying drive a wedge between code developers and content developers and they gleefully build and leverage any mistrust they can generate.
#FLIGHTGEAR AIRPORTS KEUG HOW TO#
not everyone understands how to play together nicely. This happens when projects get popular and are willing to accept all comers. There are one or two or three individuals who can't help being negative more often than they are positive. There are a couple special cases of people who are unable or unwilling to dissent gracefully. Jabberwocky: there is no growing mistrust between core developers and content developers.
0 kommentar(er)
